ORDERED, that the Plaintiff’s Motion is GRANTED and it is further Upon consideration of the Plaintiff’s Motion in Limine to Preclude Defendant’s Experts it is this _ day of _, 20010, by the Circuit Court for Baltimore County, Maryland, hereby IN THE CIRCUIT COURT FOR BALTIMORE CITY, MARYLAND Mail, first-class, postage prepaid, this 17 th day of March, 2004, to: I hereby certify that a copy of the foregoing Motion in Limine to Preclude Defendant’s Experts was sent via U.S. As such, Defendant has failed to disclose its expert in compliance with the Maryland Rules and the Scheduling Order issued in this case and their expert opinions should be precluded. Even worse, Defendant’s designation is lacking any mention of what the expert opinions actually are. In this case, Defendant’s deadline to comply with this Maryland Rule was on July 23, 2010Īlthough the Defendant has identified the subject matter upon which its experts intend to testify, Defendant has not provided a summary of the grounds of their expert opinion, nor has it attached a copy of any report prepared by her experts concerning their opinions and findings. Rule 2-402(f)(1) including: the identity of the witness, the subject matter on which the expert is expected to testify, a summary of the grounds of the expert’s opinion, as well as a copy of any report prepared by the expert concerning his or her opinions and findings. By this very rule, the party’s designation must contain the information required by Md. Maryland Rule 2-504(b)(1)(B) requires a Scheduling Order to include one or more dates by which each party shall identify each person it intends to call as an expert witness at trial. No peer review report was provided or any basis of support for their conclusions. Defendant’s experts never disclosed that their opinions would include anything beyond the extent of the above statement. The proffered “opinions” of the Defendant’s experts are stated as follows: “It is anticipated that both experts will testify that it cannot be said to a reasonable degree of medical probability that the Plaintiff’s medical condition was proximately caused by the accident in question.” Id. On the day the Defendant’s designation of experts deadline, defense counsel by correspondence designated Dr. Plaintiff has not received any of the documents requested in her requests for production of documents. All notes, diagrams, photographs, x-rays or other documents prepared or reviewed by each person whom you expect to call as an expert witness at trial.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |